Retraction of biased journal articles.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
چرا مقالات زیست پزشکی ایرانیان باز‌پس‌گرفته می‌شوند؟
Introduction: Retraction of articles occurs as a result of scientific misconducts or honest errors. The present study aimed to examine retracted articles on PubMed database written by Iranian authors in biomedicine. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, all retracted articles on PubMed database written by Iranian authors were retrieved using the following keywords; Iran [AD] AND ...
متن کاملExploring the characteristics, global distribution and reasons for retraction of published articles involving human research participants: a literature survey
Aim Article retraction is a measure taken by journals or authors where there is evidence of research misconduct or error, redundancy, plagiarism or unethical research. Recently, the retraction of scientific publications has been on the rise. In this survey, we aimed to describe the characteristics and distribution of retracted articles and the reasons for retractions. Methods We searched retr...
متن کاملWhy Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
BACKGROUND The number of retracted scientific publications has risen sharply, but it is unclear whether this reflects an increase in publication of flawed articles or an increase in the rate at which flawed articles are withdrawn. METHODS AND FINDINGS We examined the interval between publication and retraction for 2,047 retracted articles indexed in PubMed. Time-to-retraction (from publicatio...
متن کاملمطالعه علم‌سنجیِ مقاله های سلب اعتبارشده ایرانی
This is to study Iranian retracted papers indexed in Web of Science (WOS) in various Structural and content-wise aspects from the beginning to 2017 to identify cases have ended up to retraction Finally, to investigate the relationship between retraction and publication of these articles. Methodology / Approach: The final research population is 103 papers out of 320872 which using scientometrics...
متن کاملWhy and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008.
BACKGROUND Journal editors are responsible for what they publish and therefore have a duty to correct the record if published work is found to be unreliable. One method for such correction is retraction of an article. Anecdotal evidence suggested a lack of consistency in journal policies and practices regarding retraction. In order to develop guidelines, we reviewed retractions in Medline to di...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- BMJ
دوره 351 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015